Kapadia with whom swatanter kumar j agreed, and a concurring but much longer judgment of k. Guidelines for court functioning through video conferencing during covid19 pandemic. The supreme court there were two judgments delivered in the supreme court. Vodafonehutch deal and hence the it department was free to make the new assessment as. Even more importantly, it is heartening that the court has taken what it is submitted is the correct view especially on the facts of vodafones case. Supreme court allows appointment of chairman vodafone, the worlds secondlargest mobile operator, entered india in 2007 by acquiring hutchison whampoas wireless assets. Published on fri, jan 20,2012 16 24, updated at fri, jan 20 at 16. Following the supreme court sc judgment in january 2012. Supreme court issues landmark judgment in vodafone case. Following the supreme court judgment on the agr matter, the company has recognised a charge of rs25,677. In the vodafone 2 decision published today the court of appeal overturned the high court decision, which.
Uoi the supreme court has laid down several important and farreaching principles of law on tax planning vs. The 1issue before the court in this appeal is beguilingly simple. In a detailed examination of the transaction documents, the revenue as. In a full reversal of the earlier decision against vodafone in the bombay high court, vodafone s appeal was unanimously. The supreme court decision on the allowability of interest on.
Dec 16, 2016 vodafone wins transfer pricing tax dispute case. Statement from vha chief strategy officer dan lloyd. In appeal, the supreme court remanded the matter to the ao to first pass a preliminary. An analysis of the supreme courts judgment in vodafone. That possibility exists for as long as a withdrawal agreement concluded between the eu.
The supreme court judgment in the 08x numbers appeal 1. Even more importantly, it is heartening that the court has taken what it is submitted is the correct. Vodafone has maintained throughout this litigation, a straightforward application of the standard apportionment formula 2014 stt 16625 vodafone asks tennessee supreme court to hear alternative apportionment dispute. On 20 january 2012, the supreme court of india delivered its eagerly anticipated decision in vodafone international holdings bv v. Free downloadable judgments laws in india, supreme court. The judgment highlights that the hutchinson transaction in which vodafone acquired a single share of an htil subsidiary was a valid structural transaction and the indian authorities had no jurisdiction to tax such an offshore transaction. In october last year, vodafone won a transfer pricing case having an. Vihbv appealed this ruling to the indian supreme court. The judgment is available now for download from the sc website or via a copy hosted by legally india.
The supreme court of india recently issued a landmark judgment in the muchawaited vodafone case. In the vodafone 2 decision published today the court of appeal overturned the high court decision, which had found that the uks controlled foreign companies cfc legislation was ineffective. Judgement definition of judgement by the free dictionary. It is hoped that the government will respect and accept. The supreme court judgment in the 08x numbers appeal. It said that post the adverse sc order in the longstanding agr case, airtel and the combined entity of vodafone idea are liable to pay rs 21,700 crore and rs. It is not in dispute that assessees were assessed under the said provision which. Supreme court to hear govts appeal in vodafone tax dispute. Judgment hesham ali iraq appellant v secretary of state for the home department respondent before lord neuberger, president lady hale, deputy president lord kerr lord wilson lord reed lord hughes lord thomas judgment given on 16 november 2016 heard on 12, and 14 january 2016.
The apex court also said the rs 2, 500 crore which vodafone has already paid should be returned to. The supreme court on tuesday left the matter of disqualification of politicians carrying criminal charges against them, to the parliament saying that the court cannot add to the grounds of disqualification. The supreme court judgment, on the face of it, has serious implications for the. Judgment durkin appellant v dsg retail limited and another respondents scotland before lady hale, deputy president lord wilson lord sumption lord reed lord hodge judgment given on. Analysis vodafones supreme court victory in india speed read the supreme court of india has overturned the decision of the bombay high court in the vodafone case, and has found that indian capital gains tax did not arise on an indirect transfer of shares in an indian company. Oct 25, 2019 the supreme court s judgement thursday backing the governments definition of adjusted gross revenue agr may hasten further consolidation, paving the way for a twooperator telecom market, comprising reliance jio and bharti airtel, with vodafone idea s very survival at stake, analysts said. In deciding for vih, the supreme court restored muchneeded clarity. Supreme court agrees to hear the governments appeal against a delhi hc order that allowed arbitration in the vodafone tax dispute case under the indiauk bilateral treaty. This, they said, is since voda ideas total licence fee outstandings including interest and penalties. The decision of the indian supreme court in vodafone and indias proposed retrospective counteracting legislation summary on 20 january 2012 the indian supreme court found that india had no basis to tax the sale by a nonindian subsidiary of indirect interests in an indian telecoms company, hutchison essar. The latest supreme court judgments for april 2020 with complete details of case numbers, parties name, judge names and headnotes. Vodafone ruling supreme court shows the way the hindu. Pdf a goal of transfer pricing may be to maximize after tax revenue besides.
The supreme court decision on the allowability of interest on capital borrowed 6 may 2019 recently, the supreme court in the case of reliance industries ltd. It is submitted that the supreme court in the case of miheer h. The decision of the indian supreme court in vodafone and indias proposed retrospective counteracting legislation. The supreme court judgment on 20 january 2012, following an 11week hearing in late 2011, the supreme court found unanimously in. Shares of vodafone idea fell by more than 23% on friday after indias apex court. In the later proceedings before the inner house pc world did not challenge the sheriffs finding that the contract of sale had been rescinded. This appeal is directed against the full bench judgment and order dated 1422003 of the high court of kerala at ernakulam whereby the writ appeal filed by. In the impugned judgment, the high court has rightly observed that the. Nov 15, 2019 following the supreme court judgment on the agr matter, the company has recognised a charge of rs25,677. Jan 22, 2012 in our post on the judgment of the bombay high court, we expressed the hope that the supreme court would take a different view. Vodafone responds to federal court decision vodafone.
Landmark legal cases for clat landmark legal cases. It said that post the adverse sc order in the longstanding agr case, airtel and the combined entity of. No one appears for the respondents although they had been served. Reactions to the supreme court decision on vodafone the. Prior to supreme court ruling on vodafone, there was a sense of cynicism among the global investors on the approach adopted by revenue authorities in. Hutchisonessar ltd hel to form vodafone india in 2007, the company clutched south.
Hutchison essar limited subsequently renamed vodafone essar ltd. The court of appeal held that the cfc legislation can be interpreted so as to be compatible with the ec treaty. The supreme court s judgement thursday backing the governments definition of adjusted gross revenue may hasten further consolidation, paving the way for a twooperator telecom market, comprising reliance jio and bharti airtel, with vodafone ideas very survival at stake, analysts said. Virtual legal assistant, query alert service and an adfree experience. Supreme court allows appointment of chairman vodafone, the worlds secondlargest mobile operator, entered india in 2007 by. In todays judgment, the full court has ruled that, when a member state has notified the european council of its intention to withdraw from the european union, as the uk has done, that member state is free to revoke unilaterally that notification. The supreme court s judgement thursday backing the governments definition of adjusted gross revenue agr may hasten further consolidation, paving the way for a twooperator telecom market, comprising reliance jio and bharti airtel, with vodafone idea s very survival at stake, analysts said. Pdf transfer pricinga case study of vodafone researchgate.
Cit supreme court section 44bb starts with nonobstante clause, and the formula contained therein for computation of income is to be applied irrespective of the provisions of sections 28 to 41 and sections 43 and 43a of the act. The court held that article 194 of the constitution of india does not expressly authorize the state legislature to create the office of parliamentary secretary. In october last year, vodafone won a transfer pricing case having an additional demand of rs. Supreme court to hear govts appeal in vodafone tax. Landmark supreme court verdict in the vodafone case. We respect the decision of the federal court, and we thank justice griffiths for his consideration of this matter. Vodafone idea shares tumble 23% after india orders it to pay billions. It did, however, agree to hear the companies modification plea. Jiohit bharti airtel, vodafone idea q2 loss singe indian. Nov 14, 2017 prior to supreme court ruling on vodafone, there was a sense of cynicism among the global investors on the approach adopted by revenue authorities in india and this ruling has nullified some of. Get free access to the complete judgment in vodafone essar gujarat ltd. The united kingdom is free to revoke unilaterally the.
High court judgment dated 8th september 2010 in the tax liability matter of. In a landmark ruling in the supreme court today, vodafone won against the tax department. Judgment hesham ali iraq appellant v secretary of state for the home department respondent before lord neuberger, president lady hale, deputy president lord kerr lord wilson. Mar 02, 2016 in this a landmark decision, the supreme court reversed the decision of the bombay high court and held that the indian tax authorities did not have territorial jurisdiction to tax the offshore transaction, and therefore, vodafone was not liable to. Cnbc tv18s payaswini upadhyay gets quick reactions from experts on what this ruling means for foreign investment in india. However, the apex court handed out a slew of directions for curbing criminalisation of politics including asking candidates contesting elections to declare their criminal antecedents. Mr adrian beltrami qc, sitting as a deputy judge of the high court. The supreme court verdict allowing the centre to recover rs 92,641 crore in total adjusted gross revenue agr from telecom operators in india is a massive blow to bharti airtel and vodafone idea ltd, kotak securities has said. Ngos receiving substantial financing from govt come under rti. In its dispute referral, gamma referred to the supreme ourts judgment in the i8x numbers appeal1 but noted that judgment was of limited relevance given it related to the application of ofcoms dispute resolution powers in a situation where there were no specific regulatory.
The supreme court decision on the allowability of interest. High court judgment template courts and tribunals judiciary. In one of the most high profile cross border tax litigation involving taxability of a. However, the supreme court noted that vodafone could approach the high court if it was ruled against.
Supreme court laid down exhaustive guidelines regarding section 498a of ipc, 1860. Supreme court the top court said the rti act was enacted with the purpose of bringing transparency in public dealings and probity in public life. Section 324 of the 2007 act provides that, for the purposes of section. The foregoing, as well as certain other crucialclinching viewpoints, now stand covered in the subject sc judgment, may be found to have been elaborated at length in the published article written with reference to the first hc judgment dismissing the writ petition high court s decision in the matter of vodafone an analysis 2009 176. Indias supreme court rules for vodafone a welcome signal. The muchawaited judgment delivered by the bombay high court on sep tember 8, 2010, in the case of vodafone international. Vodafone then filed a special leave petition slp before the supreme court under article 6 of the constitution of india against the decision of the bombay high court. The court also directed the parliament to make a law to ensure that candidates with criminal records dont enter public life and take part in lawmaking.
In this a landmark decision, the supreme court reversed the decision of the bombay high court and held that the indian tax authorities did not have territorial jurisdiction to tax the offshore transaction, and therefore, vodafone was not liable to. That the court has now done so has been welcomed as much needed respite in bad times. The bombay high court in its decision of december 3, 2008, dismissed vodafones writ petition on the grounds of nonmaintainability. In a strongly worded judgement, the supreme court rejected telecom networks. Supreme court declared this act as unconstitutional. The supreme court of india rules in favor of vodafone in a.
Supreme court judgment, the court is of the view that there. Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be. Ngos receiving substantial financing from govt come under. The supreme court of india after hearing the matter for over two months, has delivered its much awaited landmark 275page decision, involving taxability of a transaction between two nonresident companies having no presence in india, in relation to transfer of shares of an overseas company, in favour of vodafone international bv vih to hold that the transaction is not taxable in india and. Aug 27, 2012 get free access to the complete judgment in vodafone essar gujarat ltd. The court of appeal judged that the uk cfc rules should be interpreted as if it had a new additional. The decision of the indian supreme court in vodafone and. Our expert editorial team has carefully analyzed the entire.
848 709 86 1429 1100 461 820 899 670 379 875 684 554 128 1105 1528 1295 624 111 203 260 1617 39 1468 457 1412 1267 594 520 396 1493 685 781 651 1492 75 717 974 672